‘links’ Category

  1. Cameraman (2010) ** / A Serbian Film (2010) ***

    May 14, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    More Slant reviews! One documentary and one transgressive film that I liked quite a bit.

    As a proud Powell and Pressburger completist, my chief complaint regarding Craig McCall’s 12-years-in-the-making documentary Cameraman: The Life and Work of Jack Cardiff is that we’ve seen the best material here before. Essentially an expanded version of McCall’s featurette “Painting with Light,” available on the Criterion Collection’s Black Narcissus DVD and Blu-ray, Cameraman covers the entirety of Cardiff’s career as an operator, technician, 2nd unit director, cinematographer, and finally film director through copious clips and interviews with collaborators, notable fans, and the man himself. It should be said that “Painting with Light” is arguably one of the best Criterion supplements; Cardiff explicates, with down-to-earth sardonicism, the inner workings of a Technicolor camera, and passionately discusses the painters that influenced the light schemes of the Himalayan nunnery. But after Cameraman runs dry on this material, and Cardiff’s relationship with the Archers ends, the film offers precious little in the way of biographical piquancy to compensate for its subject’s myriad of uninteresting projects.

    Read the rest.

    The rare piece of transgressive art that’s more grimly meditative than satirical or allegorical, A Serbian Film’s most daring aspect may be the muddle of soul-searching it demands from its audience. With sickeningly smooth digital cinematography and a terminally rusted conscience, the film pummels an assembly line of taboos beyond the point of recognition—indeed, nearly beyond perversion. The filial kink and corporeal grittiness set out not to offend our rubric of taste, but to dismantle it, and thereby reveal the pensively anthropological nuance of their grotesqueness.

    Pasolini’s similarly disturbing Salò bemoaned the manner in which fascism cultivates a world with two classes and no exploitative limits; one suspects from the title that A Serbian Film’s raucousness is meant to be taken as an analogous socio-political salvo. But aside from a sputtering monologue comparing Serbia’s masses to raped, dithering orphans, writer-director Srdjan Spasojevic’s content flowers with mostly psychological resonance; his film is better than the nationalist lividness that may have been its impetus.

    Read the rest.


  2. Something Wild (1986) ***1/2 — DVD Review

    May 9, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    At Slant.

    …Few directors, however, have tackled social and personal shape-shifting as concretely or as intuitively as Jonathan Demme. Throughout his diverse yet unified oeuvre, characters are uncannily aware of what makes them tick, to the point that exposition is occasionally bypassed altogether. Something Wild, one of his best films, stylizes this strength of personality a step further with people who are addicted to reinvention, both as a means of expression and as a method of exposing absurdity. When Lulu (Melanie Griffith) catches go-getter businessman Charles Driggs (Jeff Daniels) skipping out on a lunch check in a Manhattan diner, she’s wearing a straight, black wig and faux-voodoo accoutrements around her neck and wrists; before the movie hits the halfway mark, she’s exchanged this for a cozy, floral sundress and cropped, bleach-blond hair. By the time the film ends, she’s dragged Driggs through at least four iterations of herself, and done it all with a sarcastic smile not for the thrill of the moment, but the depth of possibility at her fingertips.

    In the third act, we meet Lulu’s ex-boyfriend, paroled criminal Ray (Ray Liotta), who gleefully remembers robbing convenience stores at gunpoint while wearing a ski mask, only to escape with the loot, ditch his headgear, don a coat, and return to the crime scene moments later unnoticed. There’s an unspoken philosophy shared by these two erstwhile lovers: that only fools and suckers distinguish human beings by traits as superficial as appearance and demeanor. And this, too, is a governing law of Demme’s cadence-oriented universe, a mid-’80s new-wave wonderland of pale pinks, purples, and blues where clusters of teenage rappers congregate at the periphery of our dramatic focus.

    Read the rest.


  3. Bob’s Burgers (2011) *** – TV Review

    April 4, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Half of Home Movies‘ Coach McGuirk is alive and well and living it up on this show. Read on.

    The aforementioned Loren Bouchard created and developed Bob’s Burgers with King of the Hill alumnus Jim Dauterive; for both writers, environments and relationships preclude premise and storytelling. So unsurprisingly, I’ve encountered—and sympathized with—fans of FOX’s Sunday-night lineup who’ve been reluctant to embrace Bob’s Burgers’s admittedly weak exposition. For starters, the pressures of a family-owned fast-food joint feel like fodder for a high-concept studio film that can squeak a few winking innuendos past a PG rating. Furthermore, the show’s pale, crayon-like color palette and five-o’-clock-shadow fetish seem to lazily amalgamate King of the Hill’s doodly aesthetic with Arrested Development’s instantly recognizable orange-on-white branding strategy. (The theme to Bob’s Burgers even prominently features a ukulele.) Despite all this sputtering, however, the half a season thus far aired has been a welcome attempt on Bouchard’s part especially to fuse Home Movies’s interpersonal orientation with more traditional situation comedy.

    The offbeat family dynamic is the show’s greatest asset: The lesson, refreshingly, is less that “We’re okay even though we’re weird” and more “We’re so weird that I don’t know how we’re surviving, but fuck it.” Bob is the most normal of the gang, with his chosen occupation a seeming plea for wholesome sanity; his scrawny, adenoidal wife, Linda (John Roberts), and stand-up comedian-voiced children Tina (Dan Mintz), Gene (Eugene Mirman), and Louise (Kristen Schaal) are enthusiastically antisocial. In one episode, Linda attempts to convert their apartment above the burger restaurant into a bed and breakfast despite the building’s low-rent urbanity; when her few guests turn down offers of wine, cheese, and board games, she unleashes an aggressively needy cheerfulness.

    Read the rest at Slant.


  4. The Mikado (1939) *** – DVD Review

    March 31, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    This went up on Slant earlier this week, but I neglected to post it amid personal life turbulence. Whatever else can be said, Gilbert and Sullivan make for quite “creative” break-up music.  Excerpt:

    …It’s this, and the striking modernity of the gags, that have preserved The Mikado‘s glory in spite of its now-esoteric satirical content. (The easy laughs are often the deepest and most familiar: When the jilted betrothed Katisha attempts to expose the protagonist’s secret royal heritage, the crowd continually interrupts her with Monty Python-like nonsense.) And so the disappointment of the 1939 film adaptation of the opera by director Victor Schertzinger and producer/composer Geoffrey Toye, now out on Blu-ray, rests less on the clumsy hacking received by the already convoluted libretto and more on the awkwardness with which the play’s usually sharp comedy is rendered. To be sure, the fusillade of exposition provided by the introductory title cards makes David Lynch’s Dune appear narratively competent. But one feels as though he isn’t supposed to follow the story too doggedly here anyhow. What we truly miss is the half-smirking pomposity of Gilbert and Sullivan’s élan; the simplicity of the camera angles and by-the-book editing pace can’t quite keep up with the deftness of the music or lyrics.

    Read the rest you know where.


  5. Small Source of Comfort (2011) *** out of five

    March 18, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Yep, my first piece at Slant in almost a month is a less-than-polished music review (even the tagline I chose is grammatically incorrect! Grrrrrr!). Still, I quite like Bruce Cockburn in spite of (or perhaps because of, perversely?) who he tends to appeal to in the states; and if nothing else, he’s fine evidence by comparison that we’re living in a pseudo-theocracy. My psyche was poised for a much harder hit than Small Source of Comfort delivered, though. Hopefully his live show in May will pick up the slack.

    And I’m 27 on Sunday. How are you?

    …[E]ven when setting fiery internal monologues to his modal-tuned fingerstyle guitar licks, Cockburn evokes a curious concreteness: The fractured industrial imagery of “Tokyo,” “Silver Wheels,” and “How I Spent My Fall Vacation” is so lucid that it feels more like jumbled journalism than its seeming intention as allegory. And the hit “If I Had a Rocket Launcher” is so baldly specific, even in its ersatz third-world rhythms, that it makes one wonder whether the inspiration for the vaguely violent cowboy reggae of “Peggy’s Kitchen Wall” was equally empirical.

    “The Iris of the World,” the leading track from Cockburn’s Small Source of Comfort, his first album since 2006, half admits this lyrical tendency. “I have a way with time and space,” he sings, not coincidentally after delivering the most satisfying stanza on the record (the line “In the age of global warming, when all things are getting colder” drips Cockburn’s trademark sarcasm-for-a-cause). The retreat that follows, however, “…but numbers freak me out,” is discouragingly flippant. It’s not the admission of weakness or colloquial awkwardness here that feel unconvincing, but the irrelevancy of the confession. Like James Baldwin, Cockburn’s writing sharpens as he struggles to remain calm and process potentially crippling intensity into something useful. (This mechanism, too, is what enables nonbelievers to enjoy Cockburn’s ecclesiastic musings without guilt; he tempers his knowingly irrational adoration for Christ with the same poetic instinct he uses to discuss his “problems” with the United States’s foreign policy.) If and when he finally arrives at exasperated acceptance, as he ostensibly has with the issue of peak oil explored in “Iris of the World,” the trenchancy tapers off though: “I’m raw anticipation of our rhythmic rendezvous,” he says at the clunky, inexplicably love-struck close.

    Read the rest at Slant.


  6. The Critics (2011) @ the Siskel Center in Chicago

    February 23, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    A piece on local filmmaker Jim Sikora’s The Critics, mostly worth reading for some film journalism doomsday language. Excerpt:

    Adapted from a scathingly self-reflective stage play by novelist and former Chicago Reader staff writer Adam Langer, The Critics is an icily witty exercise in Windy City rancor. Structured petulantly around the proving of the titular characters’ static buffoonery, the multi-layered plot doesn’t so much burn Langer’s vocational bridges as intimately dismantle them. With the begrudging coverage the film has received from Langer’s prior employers especially, one expects the script to feel like an elaborate indulgence—an intricate, if ultimately masturbatory, pressure valve for a fed-up aesthete. But the extent to which Langer was exasperated with theater in the late 90′s (a period during which, not coincidentally, Broadway arguably underwent a corporate candy coating) facilitated a far more deliberate and introspective attack than that glossing would suggest….

    Throughout our descent into the script’s reflexive fictional realities (we see an abridged version of Before Swine reenacted by the six central characters as the movie’s climax) the border between criticism and creativity is treated as a fickle, semi-permeable membrane. Most of the New Void‘s writers have no trouble unleashing 600 words of fetid hostility toward “an updated Major Barbara” or “some shitty improv thing,” but when it comes to inventing their own dialogue, they stare at blank pages for eons. Implicit in this scenario is a truism few of us want to admit—that the critical impulse, while deeply personal, is more reactive and adaptive than “creative,” per se. (Paul Schrader came close to a definitive statement on these “separate but equal” arts when he claimed that his critical voice often disapproves of the choices of his directorial one.)

    Read the rest @ Slant.


  7. Ip Man 2 (2010) *** / When We Leave (2010) **

    February 1, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Some Slant reviews from last week.

    Excerpt:

    Picking up roughly a decade after the bleak if preposterous Pacific War milieu of Ip Man, director Wilson Yip’s sequel follows the titular Wing Chun master as he attempts to set up shop anew amid the ever-splintering martial arts traditions of British-occupied Hong Kong. After a brief, desaturated recap of the first film’s timeline, the orange, browns, and greens of Ip Man’s (Donnie Yen) new, student-less (and penniless) studio flood the frame, as if to signal the comparative warmth of the content to follow. And, indeed, the second—and, to date, final—entry in this overseas blockbuster series is more spirited and humorous than its predecessor, successfully lowering the stakes that motivate the propulsive fluidity of the fight scenes from pure survival (against the ruthless Japanese) to vaguely nationalistic honor, which is threatened by the mostly just unattractive English.

    Despite this slackening of narrative urgency, however, Yip has duplicated the flawed approach of the earlier movie with striking exactitude: Most of the highlights are in the first, Chinese-centric act, the cartoonishness of the foreign antagonists collapses whatever subtly in character development might have been achieved, and the real-life Ip Man’s robust opium habit is left a matter for a less visceral medium. Still, Yip and Yen prove admirably and unabashedly loyal to Kung Fu conventions, which they’re less interested in paying homage to than in lacquering into a storytelling art—each of the melees, from the opening scene where Ip Man conquers and draws a group of thugs into his disciplehood, are structured as showy, plot-furthering conversations. And while best presented to the American public as better-than-average, ersatz-B-grade Asian-action flicks, both Ip Man films provide a pulpy, bio-fic window into the populist resistance of southern China’s psyche.

    The Rest.

    Excerpt:

    If Feo Aladag’s shrill, soapy When We Leave is able to repeat its festival-circuit success with the U.S. theatrical press and AMPAS (it’s Germany’s official Oscar submission), it’ll likely be due to the feisty, termitic performance at its center. Sibel Kekilli, playing the scrawny, battered, Turkish-German mother Umay, deserves attention primarily for resisting the plodding stateliness of Aladag’s neophyte directing. Even in the wordless opening, which blinks us from a vague flash forward of violence to a cool gray hospital room where Umay lies in anticipation, the film apes the anticlimactic mood fetishism of Blue while seemingly forgetting Krzysztof Kieslowski’s subtle emotional cues. What follows isn’t much more encouraging; the new director admirably avoids mirroring the storyline’s physical turbulence with the churning grit of handheld photography, but the meditative camera angles and vibrantly burnt colors palettes make When We Leave one of the few eastern European woman’s issues films to be shot like a designer catalogue.

    Still, it’s fun to watch Kekilli sexily chew through the pressboard plot Aladag’s situated her in. A young mother living with her brutish husband’s family in Istanbul at the film’s start, Umay retreats to her home country with son Cem (Nizam Schiller) in tow after aborting a prospective second child to protect it from her less-than-ideal domestic circumstances. Once in Berlin, however, she finds her Muslim fundamentalist mother (Derya Alabora) and father (Settar Tanriogen) so ashamed of the imminent divorce that they’re ready to decry their daughter as a whore and hang their heads before the staunch conservativism of their community. Following suit, Umay’s older alpha-male brother, Mehmet (Tamer Yigit), would rather see her dead and Cem with his daddy, while a young and more effeminate male sibling, Acar (Serhad Can), continues to uphold the rigidity of their family values despite apparent inner conflict. Umay’s forced to orchestrate escape once again, and the remainder of the film follows her attempts to puncture the curtain of tradition that’s blocking reconciliation with her parents.

    The Rest.


  8. Johnny Mad Dog (2008) ***

    January 18, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Excerpt:

    Perhaps the mind-boggling tardiness of the United Nations, who didn’t even acknowledge the military use of youths until 1999, isn’t quite as damnable as it appears: Independent of its humanitarian implications, the ubiquity of child armies is a philosophical nightmare. Granted, there’s something quite cosmic about them, and about the notion that man’s aggression can transcend age if coerced into action. We can aestheticize the pre- and early-adolescent mind as sharply primitive, and imagine warlords in Sudan or Darfur as abusively harnessing the raw brutality of Lord of the Flies and loading it into their artillery banks. And we can logically criticize the use of child soldiers as grossly exploitative, not only of innocent babes who don’t know any better, but of human nature’s predilection to barbarism. And yet none of this enables a usefully emotional understanding of what might drive an 11-year-old, even a starving, brainwashed one, to the heights of adult sadism—ruthless rape, relentless murder. In a way, it may be that such acts are unthinkable because we’re terrified of identifying with them. Who among us was not victimized in some fashion while young? And who among us was not, at least once, frightened more by his or her imagined retaliation than by the original aggressor?

    Johnny Mad Dog explores what happens when that inchoate rage gets its hands on unlimited ammo and a vague political purpose that legitimizes any and all violent fancies. Based on a novel by Emmanuel Dongala, the film updates the source material’s setting from the Congo to the siege of Monrovia in the Second Liberian Civil War and, remarkably, features a cast partially comprised of teenaged veterans from that conflict. The film’s politics, however, like those of Claire Denis’s White Material, are purposefully confused; the kids are fighting for the rebels against an allegedly corrupt government, but it’s impossible to tell one side from the other, or whom the U.N. peacekeepers that enter in the third act are backing. Race is tied up in it as well—the undesirable clan are “dogo”—to the point that when the child army hears Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech on the radio, they think it’s the president speaking. And, significantly, after his remark about the negro’s poverty amid a “vast ocean of material prosperity,” one of the soldiers snidely asks, “So where’s my fucking money?”

    Read the rest at Slant Magazine.


  9. I’m Dangerous with Love (2009) **

    January 12, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Excerpt:

    “You can’t be a healer without being sick, and I’m a sick motherfucker.” So goes the epigrammatic ethos of ex-junkie, one-man rehab center, and showboating post-punk wannabe Dimitri Mugianis, the desultory center of Michel Negroponte’s equally unsteady documentary I’m Dangerous with Love. As though treating himself to a lively tangent from his last film, the addiction-themed Methadonia, Negroponte follows the stocky, street wisdom-spouting Mugianis as he distributes, and manages the ingestion of, the psychoactive ibogaine to recidivist heroin users in the hopes of passing on his own shamanic escape from smack. The detox process, we’re told early on, is not precisely recreational; likened at one point to ten years of psychoanalysis condensed into 12 hours, the treatment renders most “patients” bedridden beside buckets of “purifying” vomit for a day or more, making it seem suspiciously like a state of accelerated withdrawal. Still, as one anonymous ibogaine veteran attests, the weekend or so of humiliating corporeal agony for some interrupts chemical dependence in a manner that facilitates the effectiveness of more traditional forms of therapy, like counseling…

    If only Mugianis were as worthy of our attention as Negroponte considers him. During a third-act sabbatical to Africa, he becomes more acquainted with ibogaine’s spiritual uses and he returns to New York refreshed, with plans to integrate costumed tribal worship rituals into his treatments. Questions regarding the ethics and social value of Mugianis’s vigilantism not only remain, they’ve been made clumpy with the putative “earth respect” of face paint and incense. If only both director and subject could momentarily hallucinate themselves into the afterlife; it might give a likely eye-rolling Hunter S. Thompson an opportunity to smack them upside the head.

    Read the rest at Slant Magazine.


  10. Phil Ochs: There But for Fortune (2011) **1/2

    January 3, 2011 by Joseph Jon Lanthier

    Excerpt:

    Nearly 50 years on, the relegation of folk-pop recording artist Phil Ochs to the turgid second rung of 1960s protest singers seems more an act of twisted fate than an informed critical judgment. “Fifteen years ago in the old folky show, you were just one voice in the crowd,” eulogized Harry Chapin in song shortly after Ochs’s suicide, thereby perpetuating the myth of the singer’s genericism while still attempting to canonize his passion. It’s hard to say whether that well-intentioned paean, “The Parade’s Still Passing By,” helped to skew the singer’s posthumous reputation or if it was merely a barometer of existing misconception, but it’s an apt summary of what in his legacy requires challenging. Implicit in the track’s faint praise, even, is the rumor that Ochs’s death was in part inspired by his inability to compete with Bob Dylan’s appointment as generational spokesperson.

    Kenneth Bowser’s vintage photo-laden documentary Phil Ochs: There But for Fortune immediately if subtly debunks this assumption. Tracing the genesis of Ochs’s musicianship, the film illuminations distinctions in influence between the presumed folk victor and subordinate; Dylan arrived in Greenwich Village a well-oiled Woody Guthrie jukebox, but Ochs was an aspiring composer who idolized Elvis, Hank Williams, and Bob Gibson well before he reached New York City. Commenting on the brief period that both enjoyed under the tutelage of Pete Seeger, who saw no disparity in quality between them, talking head Christopher Hitchens further elucidates that Ochs’s impersonal nature made him the anti-Dylan. “Anyone could like Bob Dylan,” he offers, “but [Ochs's songs were] far more political and tough-minded.”

    Read the rest at Slant Magazine.